Filosofi: epistemologi og vidensteori
Se alle bogdetaljer →
Why We Doubt
A Cognitive Account of Our Skeptical Inclinations
Udgivet af Oxford University Press
ISBN
9780198871965
Om denne bog
This book, the first of its kind, puts forward a novel, unified cognitive account of skeptical doubt. Historically, most philosophers have tried to tackle this difficult topic by directly arguing that skeptical doubt is false. But N. Ángel Pinillos does something different. He begins by trying to uncover the hidden men…
Boghandelspriser
| Boghandel | Titel | Format | ISBN | Pris | Lagerstatus | Levering | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ingen boghandelstilbud endnuVi har titlen i kataloget. Priser vises her, når boghandlere lister den. |
|||||||
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
0%
Anbefaler
0
Verificeret
Ingen anmeldelser endnu
Bogdetaljer
Forfatter
Prof N. Angel Pinillos
Forlag
Oxford University Press
Kategori
Filosofi: epistemologi og vidensteori
ISBN-13
9780198871965
EAN
9780198871965
Format
Indbundet
Sprog
Engelsk
sider
304
Undertitel
- A Cognitive Account of Our Skeptical Inclinations
Produktbeskrivelse
This book, the first of its kind, puts forward a novel, unified cognitive account of skeptical doubt. Historically, most philosophers have tried to tackle this difficult topic by directly arguing that skeptical doubt is false. But N. Ángel Pinillos does something different. He begins by trying to uncover the hidden mental rule which, for better or worse, motivates our skeptical inclinations. He then gives an account of the broader cognitive purpose of having and applying this rule. Based on these ideas, he shows how we can give a new response to the traditional problem of global skepticism. He also argues that philosophical skepticism is not just something that comes up during philosophical reflection, as David Hume, Charles Sanders Peirce and other philosophers have urged. Instead, it is of great practical significance. The rule which produces skepticism may itself be operative in certain pathologies such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, in creative endeavors, and in conspiratorial thinking. The rule can also explain some of our reluctance to trust statistical evidence, especially in legal settings. More broadly, this volume aims to breathe new life into a classic problem in philosophy by tackling it from a new perspective and exploring new areas of application. The book will be of interest to philosophers, psychologists and anyone interested in the human capacity to doubt and to question our beliefs.
Prishistorik
Indlæser prishistorik...