Navigation

Etik og moralfilosofi

Why It's OK to Eat Meat

Udgivet af Taylor & Francis Ltd

Bogdetaljer

  • Hæftet
  • 220 sider
  • Engelsk
ISBN 9780367172763
Om denne bog

Vegetarians have argued at great length that meat-eating is wrong. Even so, the vast majority of people continue to eat meat, and even most vegetarians eventually give up on their diets. Does this prove these people must be morally corrupt? In Why It’s OK to Eat Meat, Dan C. Shahar argues the answer is no: it’s entirel…

Se alle bogdetaljer →
Prissammenligning

Ingen boghandelspriser listet endnu

Denne titel er i vores bogkatalog. Butikstilbud vises her, når de er tilgængelige.

Betroet sælger:

Ingen boghandelstilbud lige nu.

Søg efter ISBN
Opdateret i dag

Boghandelspriser

Boghandel Titel Format ISBN Pris Lagerstatus Levering

Ingen boghandelstilbud endnu

Vi har titlen i kataloget. Priser vises her, når boghandlere lister den.

0.0
0 anmeldelser
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
0%
Anbefaler
0
Verificeret
Alle anmeldelser (0)

Ingen anmeldelser endnu

Skriv en anmeldelse

Valgfri - Kun brugt til verifikation
0 / 5000 tegn
Bogdetaljer
Forlag Taylor & Francis Ltd
Kategori Etik og moralfilosofi
ISBN-13 9780367172763
EAN 9780367172763
Format Hæftet
Sprog Engelsk
sider 220
Produktbeskrivelse
Vegetarians have argued at great length that meat-eating is wrong. Even so, the vast majority of people continue to eat meat, and even most vegetarians eventually give up on their diets. Does this prove these people must be morally corrupt? In Why It’s OK to Eat Meat, Dan C. Shahar argues the answer is no: it’s entirely possible to be an ethical person while continuing to eat meat—and not just the "fancy" offerings from the farmers'' market but also the regular meat we find at most supermarkets and restaurants. Shahar’s examination forcefully echoes vegetarians’ concerns about the meat industry’s impacts on animals, workers, the environment, and public health. However, he shows that the most influential ethical arguments for avoiding meat on the basis of these considerations are ultimately unpersuasive. Instead of insisting we all become vegetarians, Shahar argues each of us has broad latitude to choose which of the world’s problems to tackle, in what ways, and to what extents, and hence people can decline to take up this particular form of activism without doing anything wrong.Key FeaturesFirst book-length defense of meat-eating written for a popular audiencePunchy, accessible introduction to the multifaceted debate over the ethics of eating meatIncludes pioneering new examinations of humane labeling practices Shows why appeals to universalized patterns of behavior can’t vindicate vegetarians’ claims that there’s a duty to avoid meatDevelops a novel theory of ethical activism with potential applications to a wide range of other issues

Prishistorik

Indlæser prishistorik...

Få prisalarm

Bliv underrettet, når prisen falder til dit ønskede beløb.