Romersk katolicisme og romersk-katolske kirker
Se alle bogdetaljer →
(Re)constructing Armenia in Lebanon and Syria
Ethno-Cultural Diversity and the State in the Aftermath of a Refugee Crisis
Udgivet af Berghahn Books
ISBN
9781845453527
Om denne bog
For almost nine decades, since their mass-resettlement to the Levant in the wake of the Genocide and First World War, the Armenian communities of Lebanon and Syria appear to have successfully maintained a distinct identity as an ethno-culturally diverse group, in spite of representing a small non-Arab and Christian min…
Boghandelspriser
| Boghandel | Titel | Format | ISBN | Pris | Lagerstatus | Levering | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ingen boghandelstilbud endnuVi har titlen i kataloget. Priser vises her, når boghandlere lister den. |
|||||||
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
0%
Anbefaler
0
Verificeret
Ingen anmeldelser endnu
Bogdetaljer
Forfatter
Nicola Migliorino, Nicola Migliorino Migliorino
Forlag
Berghahn Books
Kategori
Romersk katolicisme og romersk-katolske kirker
ISBN-13
9781845453527
EAN
9781845453527
Format
Indbundet
Sprog
Engelsk
sider
256
Undertitel
- Ethno-Cultural Diversity and the State in the Aftermath of a Refugee Crisis
Produktbeskrivelse
For almost nine decades, since their mass-resettlement to the Levant in the wake of the Genocide and First World War, the Armenian communities of Lebanon and Syria appear to have successfully maintained a distinct identity as an ethno-culturally diverse group, in spite of representing a small non-Arab and Christian minority within a very different, mostly Arab and Muslim environment. The author shows that, while in Lebanon the state has facilitated the development of an extensive and effective system of Armenian ethno-cultural preservation, in Syria the emergence of centralizing, authoritarian regimes in the 1950s and 1960s has severely damaged the autonomy and cultural diversity of the Armenian community. Since 1970, the coming to power of the Asad family has contributed to a partial recovery of Armenian ethno-cultural diversity, as the community seems to have developed some form of tacit arrangement with the regime. In Lebanon, on the other hand, the Armenian community suffered the consequences of the recurrent breakdown of the consociational arrangement that regulates public life. In both cases the survival of Armenian cultural distinctiveness seems to be connected, rather incidentally, with the continuing ‘search for legitimacy’ of the state.
Prishistorik
Indlæser prishistorik...