Filosofi: metafysik og ontologi
Se alle bogdetaljer →
Knowing Science
Udgivet af Oxford University Press
ISBN
9780199606658
Om denne bog
In Knowing Science, Alexander Bird presents an epistemology of science that rejects empiricism and gives a central place to the concept of knowledge. Science aims at knowledge and progresses when it adds to the stock of knowledge. That knowledge is social knowing--it is known by the scientific community as a whole. Evi…
Boghandelspriser
| Boghandel | Titel | Format | ISBN | Pris | Lagerstatus | Levering | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ingen boghandelstilbud endnuVi har titlen i kataloget. Priser vises her, når boghandlere lister den. |
|||||||
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
0%
Anbefaler
0
Verificeret
Ingen anmeldelser endnu
Bogdetaljer
Forfatter
Alexander Bird
Forlag
Oxford University Press
Kategori
Filosofi: metafysik og ontologi
ISBN-13
9780199606658
EAN
9780199606658
Format
Indbundet
Sprog
Engelsk
sider
304
Produktbeskrivelse
In Knowing Science, Alexander Bird presents an epistemology of science that rejects empiricism and gives a central place to the concept of knowledge. Science aims at knowledge and progresses when it adds to the stock of knowledge. That knowledge is social knowing--it is known by the scientific community as a whole. Evidence is that from which knowledge can be obtained by inference. From this, it follows that evidence is knowledge, and is not limited to perception, nor to observation. Observation supplies evidence that is basic relative to a field of enquiry and can be highly non-perceptual. Theoretical knowledge is typically gained by inference to the only explanation, in which competing plausible hypotheses are falsified by the evidence. In cases where not all competing hypotheses are refuted, scientific hypotheses are not known but instead possess varying degrees of plausibility. Plausibilities in the light of the evidence are probabilities and link eliminative explanationism to Bayesian conditionalization. Bird argues that scientific realism and anti-realism as global metascientific claims should be rejected-the track record gives us only local metascientific claims.
Prishistorik
Indlæser prishistorik...