Politiske strukturer og processer
Se alle bogdetaljer →
Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses
Examining Judiciary Committee Court Curbing and Court Structuring Bills
Udgivet af Springer Nature Switzerland AG
ISBN
9783030380830
Om denne bog
This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability, and judicial review. Unlike prior works, this book examines this relationship f…
Boghandelspriser
| Boghandel | Titel | Format | ISBN | Pris | Lagerstatus | Levering | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ingen boghandelstilbud endnuVi har titlen i kataloget. Priser vises her, når boghandlere lister den. |
|||||||
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
0%
Anbefaler
0
Verificeret
Ingen anmeldelser endnu
Bogdetaljer
Forfatter
H. Chris Tecklenburg
Forlag
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Kategori
Politiske strukturer og processer
ISBN-13
9783030380830
EAN
9783030380830
Format
Indbundet
Sprog
Engelsk
sider
120
Undertitel
- Examining Judiciary Committee Court Curbing and Court Structuring Bills
Produktbeskrivelse
This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability, and judicial review. Unlike prior works, this book examines this relationship from a bicameral perspective, as it is argued that there are different motivations and reasons as to why and how each chamber of Congress approaches its relationship with the federal judiciary. In addition, this book considers the role of the judiciary committee in the legislative process, as bills that were reported out of committee are examined. Several possible causes of this legislative activity and judicial responses are analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary.
Prishistorik
Indlæser prishistorik...